<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Inquiry: The home of economics humor!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/</link>
	<description>What is (and isn&#039;t) funny about economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rené</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-48076</link>
		<dc:creator>rené</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-48076</guid>
		<description>you may want to have a look at &quot;The lighter side of the dismal science: The humor of economics&quot;. By: Ray, Margaret A., Social Science Journal, 03623319, 1991, Vol. 28, Issue 2

best,
rené

&lt;em&gt;YB: Thanks, I&#039;ve added it!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you may want to have a look at &#8220;The lighter side of the dismal science: The humor of economics&#8221;. By: Ray, Margaret A., Social Science Journal, 03623319, 1991, Vol. 28, Issue 2</p>
<p>best,<br />
rené</p>
<p><em>YB: Thanks, I&#8217;ve added it!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-29821</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-29821</guid>
		<description>Thanks for setting this up.  One classic you missed: http://server.eos.tuwien.ac.at/OR/Mehlmann/Andis/publ/Seminar105124/transylvanian.pdf

&lt;strong&gt;[YB: Thanks, I&#039;ve added this!]&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for setting this up.  One classic you missed: <a href="http://server.eos.tuwien.ac.at/OR/Mehlmann/Andis/publ/Seminar105124/transylvanian.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://server.eos.tuwien.ac.at/OR/Mehlmann/Andis/publ/Seminar105124/transylvanian.pdf</a></p>
<p><strong>[YB: Thanks, I've added this!]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Marrtin</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-18851</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Marrtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-18851</guid>
		<description>The Theory of  Interstellar Trade by Paul Krugman (1978).

&lt;b&gt;[YB: This one is already on my list, and in fact, I helped to get it officially published, in &lt;em&gt;Economic Inquiry&lt;/em&gt; in 2010!] But you&#039;re right that it&#039;s a great piece.]&lt;/b&gt;

http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf

&lt;i&gt;&quot;This paper extends interplanetary trade to an interstellar setting. It is concerned chiefly with the following question: How would interest charges on goods in transit be computed when the goods travel at close to the speed of light?&quot;


&quot;While the subject-matter is silly, the analysis actually does make sense. This paper, then, is a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is, of course, the opposite of what is usual in economics.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Theory of  Interstellar Trade by Paul Krugman (1978).</p>
<p><b>[YB: This one is already on my list, and in fact, I helped to get it officially published, in <em>Economic Inquiry</em> in 2010!] But you&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s a great piece.]</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf</a></p>
<p><i>&#8220;This paper extends interplanetary trade to an interstellar setting. It is concerned chiefly with the following question: How would interest charges on goods in transit be computed when the goods travel at close to the speed of light?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;While the subject-matter is silly, the analysis actually does make sense. This paper, then, is a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is, of course, the opposite of what is usual in economics.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rené böheim</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-18793</link>
		<dc:creator>rené böheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-18793</guid>
		<description>author    = {Glaeser, Edward},
   title     = {The Cinderella Paradox Resolved},
   journal   = {Journal of Political Economy},
   year      = {1992},

&lt;strong&gt;[YB: Thanks, I&#039;ve added this!]&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>author    = {Glaeser, Edward},<br />
   title     = {The Cinderella Paradox Resolved},<br />
   journal   = {Journal of Political Economy},<br />
   year      = {1992},</p>
<p><strong>[YB: Thanks, I've added this!]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Parisien</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-9950</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Parisien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-9950</guid>
		<description>The Irreverent Glossary produced by royall Brandis in 1972 also remains very appropriate, if a little dated in some of the references. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4224147

Sample entry on the Phillips Curve: 

Device used to describe phenomenon which economists are unable to explain. Term derived from Phillips screwdriver which will not fit unless right screw is chosen in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Irreverent Glossary produced by royall Brandis in 1972 also remains very appropriate, if a little dated in some of the references. <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/4224147" rel="nofollow">http://www.jstor.org/stable/4224147</a></p>
<p>Sample entry on the Phillips Curve: </p>
<p>Device used to describe phenomenon which economists are unable to explain. Term derived from Phillips screwdriver which will not fit unless right screw is chosen in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Parisien</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Parisien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>Owen Covick&#039;s &quot;The Quantity Theory of Drink - A Restatement&quot; is an all-time classic from 1974, but not easy to obtain:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1974.tb00314.x/abstract</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen Covick&#8217;s &#8220;The Quantity Theory of Drink &#8211; A Restatement&#8221; is an all-time classic from 1974, but not easy to obtain:<br />
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1974.tb00314.x/abstract" rel="nofollow">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1974.tb00314.x/abstract</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Cell</title>
		<link>http://www.standupeconomist.com/blog/humor/economic-inquiry-the-new-home-of-economics-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Cell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.standupeconomist.com/?p=532#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>I vote for &quot;Why I Don&#039;t Have A Girlfriend&quot; - http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/phd_students/backus/why_i_dont_have_a_girlfriend.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for &#8220;Why I Don&#8217;t Have A Girlfriend&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/phd_students/backus/why_i_dont_have_a_girlfriend.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/phd_students/backus/why_i_dont_have_a_girlfriend.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

